Please note: You only need to register / login if you wish to make representations.

You can view the full details of a representation by clicking either on the Representation ID in the top right of the summary box or on the More Details... link at the bottom.

Representations on VALP Proposed Submission - E10 Silverstone Circuit

Representation ID: 2640

OBJECT Buckingham Town Council (Councillor Robin Stuchbury)

Summary:

If Silverstone Park is a key employment area, then better transport links are required between the nearest strategic settlement ie Buckingham and the Park for employment and educational opportunities and a north/south public transport system to link the rest of the district to these employment opportunities, along with a connection to the new East-West Rail service. There is internal inconsistency between policies of employment and transport and delivery. This amounts to a lack of effective delivery going to the soundness of the Plan.

More details about Rep ID: 2640

Representation ID: 2627

OBJECT Buckingham Town Council (Mr Christopher Wayman)

Summary:

If Silverstone Park is a key employment area, then better transport links are required between the nearest strategic settlement ie Buckingham and the Park for employment and educational opportunities and a north/south public transport system to link the rest of the district to these employment opportunities, along with a connection to the new East-West Rail service. There is internal inconsistency between policies of employment and transport and delivery. This amounts to a lack of effective delivery going to the soundness of the Plan.

More details about Rep ID: 2627

Representation ID: 2501

OBJECT MEPC Silverstone GP Limited represented by Terence O'Rourke Ltd (Mr Neil Trollope)

Summary:

Silverstone Park is included as a strategic employment site (policy E1), which is welcomed by MEPC.
The plan includes a separate policy entitled Silverstone Circuit (policy E10). This makes reference to
the 'business and technology park', but it fails to clearly distinguish between Silverstone Park (MEPC)
and Silverstone Circuit (BRDC). Two landowners with distinct planning objectives control these two
sites. Therefore, the plan is not effective in this regard.
The policy wording in E10 should clearly distinguish between Silverstone Park and Silverstone Circuit.
The planning objectives and the existing/proposed land uses relevant to each site should be clearly
stated

More details about Rep ID: 2501

Representation ID: 2148

SUPPORT Historic England (Mr Martin Small)

Summary:

we welcome criterion d of Policy E10 as part of the positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of, and the clear strategy for enhancing, the historic environment required by paragraphs 126 and 157 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

More details about Rep ID: 2148

Representation ID: 838

SUPPORT National Trust (Ms Laura Waterton)

Summary:

The National Trust welcome's AVDC's recognition of the sensitivities of adjacent Stowe Landscape Gardens in relation to development at Silverstone as there are considerable implications for our interests relating to the integrity of the Stowe landscape, its setting and key views, which includes our ownership and the wider ownership of the internationally Grade I Historic Park and Garden.

We urge that any forthcoming master plans, applications, or development briefs to carefully consider the height, design, positioning and scale of any proposed building or structure and that regard is had to formal landscape assessments and setting studies.

More details about Rep ID: 838

Representation ID: 704

SUPPORT Mr Alan Sherwell

Summary:

I strongly support this. Silverstone is of international significance and brings in a lot of money from employment and tourism

More details about Rep ID: 704

Representation ID: 320

SUPPORT Cllr Warren Whyte

Summary:

Silverstone Circuit and the surrounding Silverstone Park provides a very important tourist and employment site to North Bucks.

More details about Rep ID: 320

Having trouble using the system? Visit our help page or contact us directly.

Powered by OpusConsult