Please note: You only need to register / login if you wish to make representations.

You can view the full details of a representation by clicking either on the Representation ID in the top right of the summary box or on the More Details... link at the bottom.

Representations on VALP Proposed Submission - 3.23

Representation ID: 2090

SUPPORT Historic England (Mr Martin Small)

Summary:

Historic England welcomes and supports the commitments to protecting the character (and setting) of settlements in Policy S3 and its supporting paragraphs as part of the positive strategy for conserving and enjoying, and clear strategy for enhancing, the historic environment required by paragraphs 126 and 157 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

More details about Rep ID: 2090

Representation ID: 680

SUPPORT Whaddon Parish Council (Ms Suzanne Lindsey)

Summary:

Whaddon PC fully support - see previous representation which also applies to this paragraph.

More details about Rep ID: 680

Representation ID: 428

OBJECT Hampden Fields Action Group (Dr Glynn White)

Summary:

Weston Turville and Aylesbury are already linked at the Holiday Inn with the development (ex-MDA site) of Broughton Crossing and further 2 approved developments across New Road. Any development that brings housing further south along New Road should be resisted (including Hampden Fields). The same scenario is the case for Hampden Hall where the gap is less than 100 yards already. It is beyond comprehension to have a statement such as this when the AVDC openly support schemes which coalesce Aylesbury with village settlements.

More details about Rep ID: 428

Representation ID: 353

SUPPORT Mr Phil Yerby

Summary:

Weston Turville and Aylesbury are already linked at the Holiday Inn with the development of Broughton Crossing and further expansion across New Road. Any development that brings housing further south along New Road should be resisted (including Hampden Fields)
The same is the case for Hampden Hall where the gap is less than 100 yards already. It seems to lack significant credibility to have a statement such as this when the council openly support schemes which coalesce with settlements.

More details about Rep ID: 353

Having trouble using the system? Visit our help page or contact us directly.

Powered by OpusConsult