You can view the full details of a representation by clicking either on the Representation ID in the top right of the summary box or on the More Details... link at the bottom.
Representations on VALP Proposed Submission - E5 Development outside town centres
OBJECT Historic England (Mr Martin Small)
we welcome criteria a. and i. of Policy E5, although we would also like to see a reference to "historic significance" in criterion i., as part of the positive strategy for the conservation and enjoyment of, and the clear strategy for enhancing, the historic environment required by paragraphs 126 and 157 of the National Planning Policy Framework.
OBJECT Coal Pensions Properties Limited represented by Lichfields (Zahra Waters)
Policy E5 seeks to meet the objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). However, as set out in our previous representations, the wording of the policy is confusing and repetitive and therefore not effective or justified for the reasons outlined below. In addition, we consider that the proposed impact test threshold is considerably lower than is necessary within Aylesbury and should be raised.
OBJECT J & J Design (Mr John Shephard)
We respectfully submit that there is no justification for requiring sequential testing for all non town centre development, including future community provision and new places of worship.
A change of title for the policy is requested.